@BallsOnTheDelliLatest post : Tue 24 Nov 2015 - 22:17
Last visit : Thu 1 Sep 2016 - 12:18
@bloodshot79Latest post : Sun 15 Feb 2015 - 0:25
Last visit : Wed 1 Jun 2016 - 22:29
@DeLiWrApLatest post : Tue 7 Jul 2015 - 0:45
Last visit : Sat 18 Jun 2016 - 0:11
@Flavio01997Latest post : Sun 27 Mar 2016 - 21:44
Last visit : Today (Mon 03 Oct 2016) at 20:47
@JoeyLockLatest post : Mon 29 Feb 2016 - 3:39
Last visit : Fri 16 Sep 2016 - 22:38
@jkdshLatest post : Sat 10 Oct 2015 - 3:15
Last visit : Tue 21 Jun 2016 - 2:53
@kdavis1937Latest post : Sun 7 Feb 2016 - 1:19
Last visit : Thu 22 Sep 2016 - 15:52
@MikeLefnerLatest post : Fri 25 Sep 2015 - 22:36
Last visit : Fri 16 Sep 2016 - 15:04
@MomoTheTerminatorLatest post : Mon 21 Dec 2015 - 7:54
Last visit : Mon 5 Sep 2016 - 1:28
@rest_in_pepperoniLatest post : Fri 29 Jan 2016 - 21:59
Last visit : Sun 14 Aug 2016 - 16:51
@Fluffshark (veteran)
Latest post : Fri 27 May 2016 - 21:46
Last visit : Today (Mon 03 Oct 2016) at 9:47
He's posted some screenshots yesterday, that's because someone gave him a heads' up that he's about to be demoted. But one post in 5 months is too little too late. We respect Fluff, we welcome him back to regain his activity and rank. It's easier a second time around.
@ApoqsiLast visit : Yesterday (Sun 2 Oct 2016) at 23:07
Latest post : Tue 16 Jun 2015 - 1:56
Now, we've noticed he's posted in the Batman contest.
However, the votes for demotion were cast before that, and he hasn't regained his activity beyond a few screenshots. Sorry, buddy, you'll have to re-earn your full access ^_^ I'm sure it won't be hard if you get back to making videos.
As new special situations, we've demoted two decently active members because:
1. misconduct
2. intent to leave the site
3. perceived threat of leaking (albeit just apparent and potential, not direct or imminent)
Those members are
@Archi and
@nelson01023 We've taken arguments for and against these demotions and voted twice on the matter.
Majority vote was FOR demotion both times. This doesn't mean they can't eventually regain their rank.
It just means we've applied the second lowest form of sanction, besides negative rep, for a situation that they've instigated.
Also,
@GUARDian was fired from staff for inciting ill-will toward the site and leaking staff-only information to others. Our trust in him will not be regained.
Also,
@Mr.Flux was banned by his own request to have his account suspended after he's abandoned discussions between myself and other site members.