Ok i know really? i've heard this theory before and wasn't keen on the idea for even as a kid watching the movie i hated jar jar although this video i found a while ago made me think of what might have been. what are your thoughts on this theory? would it make the prequels better or no?

would anyone want a jar jar companion?

ZombieRedNeck wrote:

would anyone want a jar jar companion?

yes defentitly so could seel him to jabba


And it would explain why jar jar dissapears suddenly

i think jar jars evil there is even a site for it

Code:

http://darthjarjar.com/

Saw this quite a while ago actually (not this video but a similar one), still an extremely well backed up theory if I do say so myself.

The Evil of Jarjar is too malevolent and insidious to be contained within the boundaries of the sith.

i really think luke skywalker is the sith lord but im very hyped for this game

Thank you for sharing the link to the site interesting facts they have, makes me wonder though if george lucas kept with that plot could any of you take jar jar seriously? I mean you got this bumbling idiot just making stupid jokes then yoda calls his bluff then you see jar jar all serious like blast a red lightsaber with a serious tone and dook it out with yoda.

I read the original Reddit post when it came out and I must say, it was truly eye opening. I don't believe the theory wholly but I am convinced that Jar Jar had a much bigger role than what was let on by EpII and III

I find this theory to be plausible even though it seems so insane at a first glance. I like keeping an open mind and this theory is both supported rather well and would open up an entirely new side of the Star Wars narrative. The thought of Jar Jar being a Sith lord seems far fetched but the evidence is telling.

I think this theory will give too much credit to Lucas in terms of mind blowing proportionality other than how Jar Jar was just suppose to be a hit for younger audiences. Dumb theory

If it turns out true you heard it here first that I will eat my socks.

That definitely wouldn't surprise me, he did directly lead to the senate to the downfall of the whole republic

I really really doubt that theory is even remotely true. Look at it from a marketing standpoint. Jar Jar is the single most hated Star Wars character. When he was introduced, many people hated him and Lucas for creating him. They have tried to write him out by giving him very little screen time in later movies because they learned from their mistake. I don't believe for a second that they will try to bring him back. Especially as the main antagonist. My whole point is he is a hated character and nobody in their right mind would try to market him again.

I think it is way more plausible Luke is the Sith. You only see Luke's hand in the trailer. Every other character makes a decent appearance aside from Luke. Why would they not give Luke a proper appearance unless he was the Sith and it's supposed to be a secret on whom he is?

I just watched the video and damn do they nitpick. They are trying to find every little every little thing they can to support the theory. They even tried using the "he moves his hands a lot". He's an animated character. He is always moving. He's not even the only character who does that. The only thing in that video that is plausible is that Lucas originally intended him to have more importance, but that in no way implies he is a Sith. He is just a pawn and was used the same as everyone else. When Lucas says that he is the key, he means he is the key pawn since he is the one who officially gives him power.

Jar Jar IS the key to all of this. They have to reveal him being the mastermind in the next episode, as it feels like the most satisfying possible plot twist in this era of cinema.